Ethics in Conflicts of Modernity

Question: Discuss about the Ethics in Conflicts of Modernity. Answer: Introduction: Practical reasoning is implied to decide the process to act. It serves as a contrast to the theoretical reasoning that implies reasons to decide what to follow. Most of the philosophers consider practical reasoning as the determination of plan of action (MacIntyre, 2016, pp.106-109). I believe practical reasoning possesses law-abiding qualities because of its categorical imperative that gets bind to the duties of an individual rather than their subjective preferences. Reason and passion are the two elemental perspectives that stand in opposition to each other and as one chooses one, he gets pulled by the competing demands of the other (Gerken, 2014, pp.725-744). If I want to make a difference by achieving his full potential, I need to tightly integrate reason and passion. There is a relationship between reason and passion that can be understood from the constant struggle that I go through to balance them for existing peacefully which was not possible by his inherited character. There fore, the abilities of practical reasoning of an individual are much controlled by my reasons and passions and their existing relationship in my philosophy. This assignment will discuss the applications of David Hume and Aristotle for understanding of the practical reasons in the field of study of sociology and anthropology. David Hume and Policy Development David Hume, a Scottish essayist, economist, historian and philosopher had an approach for the understanding of practical reasoning which was not based on the philosophical context of motivation but was based on the understanding the people that provide reasons for their actions. He established a rational relationship between the reason and passion of people that explored the psychology of people for inferring the reasons for the actions of a person (Richardson, 2013, pp.356-361). It is obvious that the factors of psychology are not enough for explaining the reasons of a person by not entailing explanatory relevance for the actions of an individual driven by his reasons and passion. Hume claimed that actions and passions are responsive to reasons that are either in contrary or in agreement with the instrumental implications of the desires and passions. He also stated that the practical form of reasoning and inference do not exist (Kasavin, 2013, pp.27-30). He has appropriately impleme nted his claims in his economic thoughts where he put forward an empirical argument that was against the British mercantilism aiding to policy development through classic economics. Since sociology and anthropology talk about people and their governments, Humes theory of economic prosperity can be of utter importance in policy development as he stated that value judgments cannot be made purely based on the facts. Since passion and action are involved in practical reasoning either in contrary or agreement, facts alone cannot suffice the policy development initiatives (Perry, Bratman Fischer, 2015, pp.220-223). Therefore, Humes claims and theories have useful application in the understanding of policy development with context to sociology and anthropology since reason here has to be a slave of passion. Without appropriate passion, policy development is not possible as it should include the culture and sentiments of the people apart from the reason for developing a policy. Aristotle and Policy Development To supplement this influential thought, the claims of Aristotle can be well implemented for understanding policy development. Aristotle, the Greek scientist and philosopher, have a remarkable influence on political developments through his theories of politics where he has compared the politicians with craftsmen (Sprute, 2015, pp. 154-156). This is an argumentative fact as politics is a form legislative science that incorporates practical knowledge and reasons whereas craft includes passion and productive knowledge. Aligning his thoughts with policy development, it can be stated that the developers should well consider what would be good to do where the actions will be a purview of the practical deliberations. Therefore, practical reasoning will form the base of the policies considering the welfare of the community which will be a balanced output of reason and passion. Aristotle and Hume have put forward their arguments by appropriately describing the understanding of policy developm ent in the context of reason and passion and their underlying relationship. However, their arguments differed as for the point of their application and the principle of their claims that treated the facts with a unique approach. David Hume and Negotiation Negotiation is another aspect of practical reasoning where David Hume has expressed his thoughts by stating that during a war, the weaker one negotiates. This has been proposed alternatively by Hume where he has stated that weaker one has the recourse to conquest the custom that they have acquired by the attribution of the ideas (Hume, 2012, pp.258-297). This statement reflects the fact that one idea can be helpful in reasoning that is concerned with the other ideas which are different from the original idea based on several circumstances. Negotiation comes into the play when structuring of the thought process is based on the consequences of the conflicting considerations. The soul has been referred to as a battlefield wherein the reason battles against the passion and this is the point where negotiation serves to bring equilibrium (Emerson, 2016, pp.155-158). This negotiation is very important in sociology and anthropology where, according to Hume, the weaker section of the communit y will have the recourse to conquest the custom with the aid of practical reasoning that can be beneficial to eliminate the pessimistic ideas in negative circumstances. In other words, the theory of Hume applies negotiation as a conflict management strategy that exists between reason and passion. Aristotle and Negotiation Defining negotiation on the lights of the rhetoric theory of Aristotle, it can be stated that negotiation can be used as a problem solving tool (Bell et al., 2013, pp. 109-111). From the perspectives of decision making, it is an agreement between two or more people for the allocation of the scarce resources. Although the theory of Hume is based on the application of negotiation as strategy for conflict management in negative circumstances, an argument can be generated with the theory of Aristotle wherein negotiation is a tool for decision making. From the both the perspectives, negotiation is utilized for the benefits of the community and its culture which forms the base of sociology and anthropology. David Hume and Persuasion Persuasion can be well explained from the argument of David Hume on practical reasoning where he made a challengeable and remarkable dictum. He stated that reason should be the slaves of the passions where passion and reason cannot make a human perform an action through his famous argument slave of the passions (Sagar, 2014, pp.615-638). He supported his argument with the statement that a person without passion will not have any reason for not doing or doing anything. Therefore, persuasion comes to play when a person needs to do or not to do an action. For doing this, it is important to share and understand the passion of the person and make him realize that by not doing or doing an activity, he can gain his passion and he will not be frustrated (Ayer Winch, 2013, pp.291-294). This principle can be applied to sociology and anthropology as this field of study deals with consequences of human behavior and social cultures of human being. The reason of the people in a community do an ac tivity can be driven by their passion that will have an effect on the private troubles and public issues based on their cultural backgrounds. Aristotle and Persuasion Aristotle had his views on persuasion based on the virtues of rhetoric which recognized the argument raised by Hume from a different perspective. Persuasion and its understanding as a practical reason are essential as a central political skill since it was stated by Aristotle that persuasion is important for the civilized political and social life through his quote the faculty of observing, in any given case, the available means of persuasion (Burnyeat, 2015, pp.126-127). Contrary to the argument of Hume, Aristotle defined persuasion as the practical understanding of ethical perspectives in relation to politics. Since politics is a part of the community that leads to the overall development of the people, therefore, the thoughts of Aristotle regarding persuasion is well applicable to this field of study. The social structure and culture of a community are largely based on its political development and here is the point where persuasion becomes important as it makes the politician tak e the right decision that is based on passion and adjudged by reason for the welfare of the community dwellers. David Hume and Methods of Introducing Change David Hume had a substantial view for the methods of introducing change where he laid down the principle of change and that includes correction of the negligence in the previous reasoning with the present expression. He mentioned about this in his work Essays and Treatise where he stated the experimental method of introducing change into the moral subjects. The demonstrative reasoning is not enough for bridging the gap between an existing policy and requirement for a change concerning matters of facts, probable reasoning and relations of ideas (Hume, 2012, pp.375-377). Therefore, Hume stated that just inference is essential for moving from the past to the future and so method of introducing change will require probable reasoning based on the principle of uniformity for connecting the past with the future. This view is applicable in sociology and anthropology due to the fact that this field of study includes social movements and social justice which requires introduction of changes fo r the sake of social reforms. Thoughts of Hume can be beneficial in laying down the methods of introducing change by interconnecting the existing social traditions with the future social transformation. Aristotle and Methods of Introducing Change Aristotle drew an argument on the methods of introducing change by identifying change as a virtue of practical reasoning as he laid down a clear distinction between practical and theoretical reasoning. He stated change as a deliberation of thoughts and therefore, expressed practical reasoning in the form of deliberation. Aristotle stated the valuable reasoning of introducing change by stating that the method should be based on correct reasoning rather than only right desires alone (Gutas, 2014, p.234). This principle is applied in the field of sociology and anthropology because of the fact that the methods of introducing change can be devised by taking a closer look at the communal world and recognizing the needs for change that is justified by correct reasoning. The cultural aspects of human beings can be influenced by correct desire and reasoning which is crucial in determining the appropriate method of introducing change. David Hume and Development The philosophy of David Hume is remarkable for development due to their ability to inspire and provoke others, continuing vitality and revolutionary insights. He developed a science based on human nature that was based on careful arguments and observable facts that are crucial for the economic, political and social development. He placed the modules on social development at the center of the philosophical debates regarding the morality foundations based on the motivational psychology of reasons and passions (Box, 2014, p. 84). He stated that cognitive states and beliefs are important to be motivated for bringing about a new action, intention and desire that leads to development. This theory applies to the field of sociology and anthropology as belief and cognitive states are involved in the development of the community with the incorporation of the desire to develop. The cultural belief of the community sets the place for passion required to motivate the belief and cognitive states r equired for development. Aristotle and Development Aristotle had a similar argument on development as he strongly recommended on balanced development of an individual with practical reasoning. He mentioned that developing a fuller understanding of what has to be achieved has the potential for a better life by involving implementation of reasons in thoughts and mastering the passions. Aristotle experienced that when passions conflict with reasons, development gets a halt and this can be overcome by making a reasoned choice that is influenced by passion in the process of deliberation (Schofield, 2013, pp.52-55). This theory is applicable in sociology and anthropology as combination of reason and passion is crucial for solving the problems of the community for the sake of development. The interaction of social, political, cultural and economic forces are required to be determined by the application of practical reasoning for modifying human behavior and bringing development. In sociology and anthropology, the philosophy of both the philosophers David Hume and Aristotle is vital as they state that practical reasoning has a positive contribution in social sciences. It not only aids in promoting development by balancing reason with passion but also helps to identify the philosophical defects existing in the social, political, cultural and economic belief and cognitive states of the human beings. Sociology and anthropology are the practical fields of study that that are largely dependent on the theories of David Hume and Aristotle and are based on practical reasoning by reinforcing their pragmatic point of views. References Ayer, A. J., Winch, R. (2013).British Empirical Philosophers (Routledge Revivals): Locke, Berkeley, Hume, Reid and JS Mill.[An Anthology]. Routledge, 291-294. Bell, J., Crossley, N., Stephens, W. O., Sullivan, S., Leary, D., Watkins, M., ... Des Chene, D. (2013).A history of habit: From Aristotle to Bourdieu. Lexington Books, 109-111. Box, M. A. (2014).The Suasive Art of David Hume. Princeton University Press, 84. Burnyeat, M. F. (2015). Enthymeme: Aristotle on the logic of persuasion, 126-127. Emerson, R. L. (2016).Essays on David Hume, Medical Men and the Scottish Enlightenment:'Industry, Knowledge and Humanity'. Routledge, 155-158. Gerken, M. (2014). Same, same but different: the epistemic norms of assertion, action and practical reasoning.Philosophical Studies,168(3), 725-744. Gutas, D. (2014).Avicenna and the Aristotelian Tradition: Introduction to Reading Avicenna's Philosophical Works. Including an Inventory of Avicennas Authentic Works. Brill, 234. Hume, D. (2012). Emotions and moods.Organizational behavior, 258-297. Hume, D. (2012).A treatise of human nature. Courier Corporation, 375-377. Kasavin, I. (Ed.). (2013).David Hume and Contemporary Philosophy. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 27-30. MacIntyre, A. (2016). Ethics in the Conflicts of Modernity: An Essay on Desire, Practical Reasoning, and Narrative, 106-109. Perry, J., Bratman, M., Fischer, J. M. (2015). Introduction to philosophy: Classical and contemporary readings, 220-223. Richardson, H. S. (2013). Practical Reasoning.The International Encyclopedia of Ethics, 356-361. Sagar, P. (2014). Minding the Gap: Bernard Williams and David Hume on Living an Ethical Life.Journal of Moral Philosophy,11(5), 615-638. Schofield, M. (Ed.). (2013).Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the first century BC: new directions for philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 52-55. Sprute, J. (2015). Aristotle and the Legitimacy of Rhetoric, 154-156.

Lysistrata Essays - Lysistrata, Women In War, Aristophanes, Peace

Lysistrata Lysistrata is a play written in 411 BC by Aristophanes. At that time in Greek history, the city-states were constantly warring with one another. Consequently, the women were left at home. One woman, Lysistrata, was so fed up with the fighting that she called all of the women of Greece to a meeting. When they finally showed up, Lysistrata presented her plan for peace: no sex until the wars ceased. She eventually convinced all of the other women that this was the only way to bring peace to the land. The men were miserable and ultimately they negotiated a treaty to stop the hostilities. This play has its merits and its downfalls. As a whole, however, it is well written, humorous, and most importantly, it has a purpose. On first glance, the play seems to be no more than a simple, comical story. Aristophanes wrote the play not only to entertain, but also to make a stand against warfare. He believed that war was an abnormal state of affairs. At the opening of the play, Lysistrata has calle d a meeting of all the women and is impatiently waiting for them. She says that she has spent long, sleepless nights agonizing over the solution to the wars. She tells Kalonike, Only we women can save Greece! As the rest of the women arrive, she informs them of her plan. The women are resistant to the idea of no sex at first. They then realize that what Lysistrata says is true. The women take an oath and swear to one another that they will have nothing to do with their husbands until the wars cease. Aristophanes' use of women as the peacemakers shows the natural role of women as nurturers. He is displaying how life should be, without war. In times of peace, men are working at home alongside their wives. When war comes about, women are left to do all the work, domestic and otherwise. This upsets the balance of daily life. Aristophanes is urging his fellow Greeks to restore peace and therefore life as they once knew it. As the play progresses, the men are in extreme pain and agony fro m the withholding of sexual activities. They come to the conclusion, grudgingly, that the women are indeed correct. To renew Greece, the fighting must end. And they are the ones with whom it has to begin. The men arrange a treaty and then celebrate with the others, Athenian and Spartan alike. But, as I can imagine, all, women and men, are anxious to get home. With this play, Aristophanes' goal was to tell an amusing story and also to spur his countrymen to resolve their differences for the sake of Greece and Greek life. We now know that they did not heed Aristophanes warnings. The Golden Age of Greece did come to an end, mostly because of the extreme pride and arrogance of the individual city-states. Aristophanes did his best to convince them, but such is the sage advice: it often goes unheeded, much to the dismay of all concerned.

7 Ways to Kick Start the Writing Habit

7 Ways to Kick Start the Writing Habit 7 Ways to Kick Start the Writing Habit 7 Ways to Kick Start the Writing Habit By Daniel Scocco Sometime ago I came across an interesting post on Freelance Folder outlining seven ways to get your creative juices flowing. If you have been writing for a while, you know that getting out of the occasional writers block is a challenging task. Below you will find the seven tips, I am pretty sure they will be useful. Write nothing but headlines Write ‘crap’ without feeling guilty Schedule regular time and show up, even if you think you can’t write Write about how you solved a problem Edit older articles Type out other people’s articles Write something right now If you want more tips we have also covered this topic in the past, check out: How to Bypass Your Internal Editor Write Super Fast How to Start Writing When You Don’t Feel Like It Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Writing Basics category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:7 Types of Narrative Conflict20 Rules About Subject-Verb AgreementWords Often Misspelled Because of Double Letters

An Analysis of Gulivers Travels;Voyage to Liliput essays

An Analysis of Guliver's Travels;Voyage to Liliput essays Generations of schoolchildren raised on the first Book of "Gulliver's Travels" have loved it as a delightful visit to a fantasy kingdom full of creatures they can relate to_little creatures, like themselves. Few casual readers look deeply enough to recognize the satire just below the surface. But Jonathan Swift was one of the great satirists of his or any other age, and "Gulliver's Travels" is surely the apex of his art. "Gulliver's Travels" tells the story of Lemuel Gulliver, a ship's surgeon who has a number of rather extraordinary adventures, comprising four sections or "Books." In Book I, his ship is blown off course and Gulliver is shipwrecked. He wakes up flat on his back on the shore, and discovers that he cannot move; he has been bound to the earth by thousands of tiny crisscrossing threads. He soon discovers that his captors are tiny men about six inches high, natives of the land of Lilliput. He is released from his prone position only to be confined in a ruined temple by ninety- one tiny but unbreakable chains. In spite of his predicament, Gulliver is at first impressed by the intelligence and organizational abilities of the Lilliputians. In this section, Swift introduces us to the essential conflict of Book I: the naive, ordinary, but compassionate "Everyman" at the mercy of an army of people with "small minds". Because they are technologically adept, Gulliver does not yet see how small-minded In Chapter II, the Emperor of Lilliput arrives to take a look at the "giant", and Gulliver is equally impressed by the Emperor and his courtiers. They are handsome and richly dressed, and the Emperor attempts to speak to Gulliver civilly (although they are unable to understand one another). The Emperor decrees that every morning Gulliver is to be delivered "six beeves, forty sheep, and other victuals," along with as much bread and wine as he needs, his basic needs are to be ...

Anything Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 1

Anything - Essay Example The current compensation system is not motivating the employees sufficiently. A lot of the employees lack experience and educational credentials. Half of the staff has been working for the store for less than six months and these workers are either high school or college students. The sales of the company are below the expectations of the parent company. It is imperative for the company to improve the communication between the managerial staff and the workers. This can be achieved through the implementation of feedback systems. A feedback system can be implemented by simply putting a suggestion box in a wall so that the employees can express themselves and provide ideas. A lot of times the best ideas are hidden in the minds of the blue collar workers. The firm has to immediately deal with the preparation of the staff. The company has too many unqualified employees working for the company. In an ideal situation all the employees of the company would hold at least bachelors degree. The re are a lot of young employees working for the company that lack work experience. The retail industry has become extremely competitive. A way for the company to improve the motivation of its workers is by offering scholarships to the best performing employees. The scholarship award will be worth $5,000 per semester. Motivating the employees is critical towards resolving the employee morale problem. â€Å"High employee morale means that employees are happy, and this is reflective in the kind of work they produce† (Ehow). A way to improve the employee morale is by instituting a new compensation system. The new compensation system will include a wide variety of fringe benefits for the employees. Some of the fringe benefits the company can offer in its new compensation plan include extended vacations, health and dental plan, the availability of flexible time, free access to a gymnasium, and parental and maternal leave. It will also include a stock option plan and yearly bonuses to the employees. The store also has to improve the knowledge base of its workers. To achieve that goal the firm will use two strategies. The first strategy is to provide training and development to all its employees. Some of the topics that should be included in the training and development sessions include interpersonal skills, active listening, customer service, verbal and written communication skills, and leadership. To optimize the efficiency and costs of the training sessions the firm should use more than one method. The training can be given in-house by one of the managers or the firm could hire an outside consultant to provide the training. Another option for the company is to give the training and development through online lessons. The second strategy that the company will utilize to increase the knowledge base among its staff is by hiring five new employees. The minimum educational credential that the new employees will hold is a bachelor’s degree. All of the new e mployees must have a minimum of three years of working experience after graduation from college. The company will also implement a new system in which the workers will be empowered by delegating more responsibility to them. The leadership style that I would use to deal with the problems at the retail store is teamwork. The company will be broken down into five work teams. Each work team will be supervised by either an employee with five or more years of experience at the company or an

Exam Q 3 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Exam Q 3 - Essay Example These methods include SWOT analysis, Porter’s five forces, and balanced scorecard. The SWOT analysis is an evaluation method that can be used by a privately owned food manufacturing company to help in the identification and prioritization of both the internal and external impacts that affect it. Strengths and weaknesses show the internal factors that may affect a business while weaknesses and threats are external factors (Sun, 2012). The company will develop strategies to make use of its strengths and opportunities, and eliminate its weaknesses and threats. The company will prepare a list of these areas that will later be evaluated to determine the top contributing factors for all of them. The SWOT will help the company to be aware of all the factors that may affect strategic planning and  making decisions. Strengths and Weaknesses refer to the resources and experience that are available to the company. The company will be in a position to identify its financial resources (income and investments), physical resources (facilities and equipment), and human resources such as software systems (Sun, 2012). SWOT analysis helps the company identify the external forces that influence it. The external forces include economic trends, demographics, political stability, and economic regulations. The Porters Five Forces will help the company to identify where it powers lies in a given situation (Grants, 2012). The company will be able to understand the strength of its current competitive position, and the strength of a position it considers moving into. The analysis argues that there are five forces that decide competitive power in a situation. The five forces are (Grants, 2012): Supplier Power: The Company will evaluate how it is easy for suppliers to set prices. The price is directed by the number of vendors of all inputs, the exceptionality of their products, and the

Mcdonald Case Study Essay Example for Free

Mcdonald Case Study Essay Mission Statement McDonald’s mission statement is: McDonalds vision is to be the worlds best quick service restaurant experience. Being the best means providing outstanding quality, service, cleanliness and value, so that we make every customer in every restaurant smile. Strategy McDonald’s competitive strategy competes on several bases, including cost, respond, speed, and health issue. Their strongest priority is â€Å"making customers happy†. Product Maturity McDonald’s in is the mature stage of their product life cycle. All the competitors are known and established. This means that they go for more of a cost structure to have a cheap product while still maintaining the MacDonald’s quality. Because the franchise maintains the same product line they can focus on cutting costs. Product Development Process MacDonald’s uses product development teams to gather many minds as a resource for ideas. This allows for the cooks, marketers, service representatives, and others to sit together and think from many different angles to come up with a product. When coming up with a product together, they try to identify potential target markets to penetrate or needs that are not being fulfilled. This is all done in a food studio in Oak Brook, Illinois. They then test the product in a small test market for 6 weeks. And then if successful there they expand the test markets to 800 to 1,000 restaurants. Ethical Performance McDonald considers priorities for food safety, product quality and costs. The facts are together with ethical, environmental and economic responsibilities. Moreover, McDonald had been pushing effort on animal welfare. McDonalds Recognized on worlds most ethical Companies List on 2009. Quality System At McDonald’s, quality is the #1 priority when serving customers. McDonalds delivers quality both through products and services by actively training each employee so that a high standard is set for the food they create. They also purchase their products from high class companies such as their fries from McCain and their drinks from Minute Maid. Process Strategy McDonald’s uses a process focus strategy by developing a system that can be used in every McDonalds you go in to. For example, when entering McDonald’s for a Big Mac meal, one employee takes the order at the counter and gets the drink, another is at the fry machine always making sure fries are made fresh, and a third employee is making the burger. Technology Strategy Along with McDonalds new approach to revamp its physical exterior image much is changing inside the restaurant itself from a technology aspect. Recently McDonalds has introduced WI-FI into many of their outlets providing customers with free access to internet to surf the web or check emails while they enjoy a meal or just a coffee. What McDonalds hopes to achieve with this is to create a more welcoming atmosphere where the food is still fast but the stay is longer and more enjoyable. The internet is one such feature where people can keep in touch while outside of the office without a need for rushing back but also McDonalds has introduced new flat screen televisions which play the local news. These technologic features with cozy leather couches and a new sleek interior look is intended to keep up with the technology changes that go on outside of the restaurant. The building itself is changing as well. McDonalds has introduced a new ventilation system in the building that quickly whisks the kitchen smells such as the burgers and fries outside of the dining room. No longer does the kitchen smell linger into the dining room providing a cleaner and more appealing way to dine within the restaurant. The kitchen is being constantly upgraded for faster and better service and McDonalds is currently looking at installing new grills that will enable them to provide their number one success all day; the breakfast menu.